<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Louisville Web Group &#187; law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.louisvillewebgroup.com/tag/law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.louisvillewebgroup.com</link>
	<description>Website design, web development, e-commerce web design, SEO, Internet Marketing, Graphic Design, Photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:52:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>How states deal with E-Commerce &amp; Tax</title>
		<link>http://www.louisvillewebgroup.com/2009/07/how-states-deal-with-e-commerce-tax/</link>
		<comments>http://www.louisvillewebgroup.com/2009/07/how-states-deal-with-e-commerce-tax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 14:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.louisvillewebgroup.com/2009/07/how-states-deal-with-e-commerce-tax/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An interesting graphic was recently posted on the issue of how different states approach Taxes and E-Commerce. As stated in the graphic and article, a Supreme Court decision from 1992 (<em>Quill v. North Dakota) </em>declared that if a business has no physical presence in a state, then sales tax needs not be collected in that state.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.louisvillewebgroup.com/2009/07/how-states-deal-with-e-commerce-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
